General

I'd really prefer no apocalypse at all, but I'd take the zombie apocalypse over a vampire or dragon one. Zombies seem pretty easy to defeat, really. Vampires are tougher, and dragons like to burn you alive.

But the one I'm really afraid of is the fundamentalist religious apocalypse*. That one might actually happen!

*Not the one predicted in the Bible--just being taken over by fundamentalist ideologues.

As a front running member for Team Z, I do not approve of this message. Dragons have fire; as everyone knows, we zombies do not like fire. Dragons are bad, especially because they will eat all us zombies and turn into zombie dragons, which are (as DH said) nearly unstoppable.

If we have to have an apocalypse with no hope of anyone surviving, I guess maybe I'd take the Vampire apocalypse. There's something satisfying about them all starving to death after wiping us out.

I pick dragons. I favour that kind of thing. I remember a quote from a story somewhere that stated the beginning of the world as dragons recall it:

"Once, there were dragons. And it was good."

Actually...for older, more powerful, Lycans the moon no longer holds it's sway. They can change at will.

And also, I'm down for the Dragon Apocalypse. Moar souls k thx, omnomnom.

I didn't like Reign of Fire. Animals that eat ashes? It doesn't make sense.